Fees: Charlton Equine Law provides accurate, up-front estimates of fees. With low overhead and an intimate understanding of the nuances of equine terminology and sport, Charlton Equine Law can provide more efficient and cost-effective services than other firms.
Corinna is licensed to practice in California and Kentucky; the dual license permits her to provide a specialized understanding and broader scope of service to clients’ equine problems and needs throughout the entirety of both states. Immigration services can be provided on a national rather than state-specific basis.
Purchase and sale agreements are perhaps one of the most familiar contracts in the equine world. A purchase and sale agreement memorializes the parties’ mutual intention to exchange a horse for a particular consideration. However, many basic or homemade contracts fail to address significant terms involved in the sale. Charlton Equine Law ensures that your contract is tailored to your needs- whether you are the buyer or the seller- that it complies with the Statute of Frauds, and that it reduces your liability by accounting for common issues that arise after a sale, such as health or lameness, performance, and trial periods.
More information coming soon!
More information coming soon!
More information coming soon!
More information coming soon!.
More information coming soon!
More information coming soon!
More information coming soon!
More information coming soon!
More information coming soon!
More information coming soon!
Litigation representation is offered for either the plaintiff or defendant. Litigation is appropriate for such cases as breaches of contract or fraud in a horse transaction, breach of warranty in an equine sale, or personal injury arising from a riding injury. Litigation typically provides the opportunity to recover larger financial damages than by other methods of dispute resolution. For particularly large or complex personal injury cases, Charlton Equine Law has a vast network of doctors and attorneys for consult on specific areas of evidence.
Mediation is appropriate when a mediation clause is included in a contract. Mediation clauses typically require that the parties attempt to resolve a dispute with a third-party mediator prior to initiating a civil lawsuit. Mediation is not a binding judgment, and often involves a level of compromise between the disputing parties. The cost-effective, expedient, and private nature of mediation are some reasons why parties prefer this choice for dispute resolution.
Arbitration may be selected by agreement between the parties, may be required by statute, or by contract. Arbitration is often considered like a “mini-trial,” though is not necessarily presided over by a judge. Arbitration is similar to a civil lawsuit, but is a more cost-effective and expedient method of resolving disputes. Arbitration typically results in a binding judgment on the parties.